Legal Opinion

Horton v. Fritz

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1997No. 28216PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, L:

Appellant Kathy Horton (“Horton”) was injured as a result of an incident that occurred during the early morning hours of November 1, 1992. She claims that she was leaning against a stationary automobile when the driver, respondent Ryan Fritz *826(“Fritz”), a seventeen-year-old minor, suddenly drove forward, causing her to fall and severely fracture her left arm. It is uncontested that Fritz left the scene of the accident without rendering aid or procuring medical assistance.

Horton sued Fritz for negligence and lost at trial. She appeals, claiming that the district…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lemond Const. Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Cheevers v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Bobby Berosini, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Powell v. DoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rock v. McHenryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API