Legal Opinion

Blount v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 26, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Carlton Blount’s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Attached Appendix Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [ECF No. 1] and the government’s Motion to Dismiss Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 10]. Because petitioner had an effective means to pursue his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and his claim concerning appellate counsel is time barred, the government’s motion will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

In the Superior Court of the District of Columbia,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graham v. FCC Coleman Usp IIDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. United States v. KelseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API