Legal Opinion

State v. Barber

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 14, 2001No. 99-23-C.APublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case came before the Supreme Court on February 6, 2001, pursuant to an order that directed the defendant, Byron Barber, to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. The defendant has appealed from a Superior Court adjudication that he violated the terms of his probation while he was serving a sentence at the Adult Correctional Institutions (ACI). After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda submitted by *79the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown, and therefore the appeal will be decided at this time.

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ross v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Lerner v. GillSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  3. Maurice R. Lerner v. Matthew Gill, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. GodetteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. State v. JacquesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  2. State v. Anthony ParrilloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017
  3. DeBritto v. Rhode Island General AssemblyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2024
  4. Rose v. StateSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  5. State v. Anthony ParrilloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API