Nathan Wertz v. Asset Acceptance, LLC.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1

NAJAM, Judge.

Nathan Wertz appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his counterclaim against Asset Acceptance, LLC (“Asset”) pursuant to Asset’s Trial Rule 12(B)(6) motion. 2 Wertz raises six issues for our review, but we need only address the following dispositive issue: whether, under Indiana’s Uniform Consumer Credit Code (“IUCCC”), Ind.Code §§ 24-4.5-1-101 to - 7-414, Asset, an out-of-state business, was required to obtain an Indiana license to collect on a debt owed by Wertz that Asset had purchased from the original lending institution. We affirm.

FACTS AND…