Legal Opinion
Schramm v. Oakes
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 16, 1965No. Nos. 8011, 8012PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
This factually complicated case is here for a third time. On the first occasion we refused an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b). When the case came up the second time, we were compelled to remand the same for lack of an appealable order.1 At that time, we sug*145gested a reconsideration of the order quashing service as to certain defendants in light of cited authorities. It is apparent that our suggestions were not followed as the appeal comes now, after a final judgment, from the order quashing service upon certain of the same original defendants. Because of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wetmore v. RymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Thelma M. Wade, as Administratrix of the Estate of Russell L. Smith, Deceased v. Dan Rogala, Doing Business as Rogala FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- John Welsh and Flo-Start, Inc. v. James W. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Oaklawn ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- O'Hare International Bank, a National Banking Association v. Berlon E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Archangel Diamond Corp. v. LukoilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.