Legal Opinion
Bridges v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 21, 1950No. 12597_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
The matter before us is a motion under Rule 39(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., to vacate an order of the district court revoking the bail of appellant, Harry Bridges. The Rule in part provides: “The supervision and control of the proceedings on appeal shall be in the appellate court from the time the notice of appeal is filed with its clerk, except as otherwise provided in these rules. The appellate court may at any time entertain a motion * * * to modify or vacate any order made by the district court * * * in relation to the prosecution of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. GottfriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Marzani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- United States v. MotlowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Edward LemonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
- United States Ex Rel. Heikkinen v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.