Legal Opinion
Gold v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 28, 1957No. 137PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is reversed and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to grant a new trial because of official intrusion into the privacy of the jury. Remmer v. United States, 350 U. S. 377; 347 U. S. 227. The fact that the intrusion was unintentional does not remove the effect of the-intrusion.
MR. Justice Reed, with whom Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Clark join, has filed a dissent. Mr. Justice Clark has filed a separate dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Allied Stevedoring Corp., John Ward, John Potter and Michael BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- United States v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Stouffer v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- State v. PokiniHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.