Allen v. Woodfield Chevrolet, Inc.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
Docket No. 94814–Agenda 12–May 2003.
CHARLES ALLEN et al. , Appellees, v. WOODFIELD
CHEVROLET, INC., Appellant.
Opinion filed October 17, 2003.
2Opinion of the Court · FitzgeraldJustice Fitzgerald
At issue in this appeal is whether certain amendments to the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Act) (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 1996)), which govern consumer fraud claims against new or used vehicle dealers, violate the Illinois constitutional prohibition against special legislation. See Ill. Const. 1970, art. IV, §13. The trial court found no constitutional infirmity; the appellate court reversed. 332 Ill. App. 3d 605. We hold that…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Grasse v. Dealer's Transport Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Bernier v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Kalodimos v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.