Legal Opinion

Colquitt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1921No. 12274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Troup superior court — Judge Terrell. December 31, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence in this case is cumulative and impeaching. The State made a counter-showing. “ Where newly discovered evidence is relied upon as a ground for.a new trial, and it appears from an examination of the approved brief of evidence that the newly discovered evidence was cumulative and impeaching in character, and, from a counter-showing made, that the evidence is conflicting as to the truth of some of the facts claimed to be newly discovered, the reviewing court will not interfere with the discretion of the court below in refusing a new trial upon such ground.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Edenfield v. BrinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. Arwood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  3. Key v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Atlanta Consolidated Street Railway Co. v. McIntireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Boney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API