Legal Opinion

Boney v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 10, 1923No. 14076Published

1Opinion of the CourtBlood worth, J.

1. The only ground of the motion for a new trial other than the general grounds is based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, the only effect of which would be to impeach the chief witness for the State. “ Though the witness sought to be impeached by newly discovered evidence was the only witness against the prisoner upon a vital point in the case, if the sole effect of the evidence would be to impeach the witness a new trial will not be granted.” Arwood v. State, 59 Ga. 391; Levining v. State, 13 Ga. 513; Wright v. State, 34 Ga. 110 (2); Jackson v. State, 93 Ga. 190 (18 S. E. 401); Haynes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edenfield v. BrinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. Arwood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  3. Wright v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1864
  4. Levining v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  5. Atlanta Consolidated Street Railway Co. v. McIntireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API