Legal Opinion

Myron W. McIntyre, Ltd. v. Chanler Holding Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

Motion under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice by plaintiff-tenant to strike out defense interposed by both defendants. the landlord and its managing agent. The action is for damages for the loss of plaintiff-tenant’s property due to the alleged negligence of defendants.

The defense is based upon an immunity clause in the lease between the parties, which by its terms attempts to exempt the landlord from liability for acts even of his own negligence. Despite the subsequent enactment of section 234 of the Real Property Law, holding similar clauses now against public policy, the court would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marks v. Nambil Realty Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Bernard Katz, Inc. v. East 30th Street Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Myron W. McIntyre, Ltd. v. Chanler Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API