Legal Opinion
Township of Marple v. Weidman
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 20, 1992No. 6 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, Senior Judge.
The Township of Marple and the Board of Commissioners of the Township of Marple appeal from an order awarding counsel fees in the amount of $3530.50 against Marple after Robert Weidman, a property owner, successfully brought a mandamus suit against the township.
This controversy originally involved the refusal of the township board to issue a permit to Weidman for the installation of an antenna on his property. Weidman brought an action in mandamus together with a motion for peremptory judgment. The township filed no answer and the judgment was granted.
Weidman then filed the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. MuirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Stoner v. Township of Lower MerionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Allegheny County Police Pension Fund v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Cianfrani v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Millstone Enterprises, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MAURICE A. NERNBERG & ASSOCIATES v. CoyneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Richard Allen Prep. Charter School v. PA, Department of Education and Pedro A. Rivera, in his official capacity as Secretary of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- KIPP Philadelphia Charter Schools v. PA, Department of Education and Pedro A. Rivera, in his official capacity as Secretary of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- County Road Users Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1999