Legal Opinion

Trenton v. Howell

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 5, 1942No. Docket 138/261PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Some precursory statement is essential to exhibit the points debated at the argument of the present motion. On March 7th, 1941, the City of Trenton, possessing a tax sale certificate, filed a bill to foreclose the equity of redemption of those having an interest or estate in the premises described in the certificate. The City acquired the fee by virtue of a final decree made in that cause on September 23d 1941. Inadvertently, the City failed to include as defendants the personal representatives of one Maggie M. Howell who held a mortgage encumbrance upon a portion of the premises embraced by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weber v. KellerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Paramount Investment Corp. v. JessopSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. North Jersey Holding Co. v. SnowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  4. Wishner v. Nibur Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  5. Bayonne v. Morris Cumings Dredging Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newark v. LodatoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Trenton v. HowellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API