Batiste v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary of a vehicle under V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 30.04. Enhanced punishment was assessed at thirteen years confinement. Appellant raised a number of claims on appeal relating to alleged ineffectiveness of his trial counsel for failing to preserve error under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), and the trial court’s denial of a means for him to perfect this ineffective counsel claim for appeal. The court of appeals held that the record was…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- In the Matter of C.O.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Prudhomme v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- State v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.