Legal Opinion

Moran & Co. v. Palmer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1905No. 4745PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Denney, J., entered February 28, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to quiet title.

1Opinion of the Court

Hadley, J. —

Respondent, a corporation, brought this suit against appellants to quiet title to certain real estate *685in Arlington, Snohomish, county. The complaint alleges ownership in respondent, and that appellants also claim to be the owners. The defendant Arthur B. Palmer separately answered the complaint, his co-defendants disclaiming any interest in the property. He avers, that, in 1890, he entered into a contract with one McLeod, the then owner of the property, for the purchase of the south twenty-three feet of lot 19 in block 6, as shown upon the plat of the town of Arlington; that he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Warren v. RichmondIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Neeson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Benham v. Columbia Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Harris v. Seattle Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Surry v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In re the Estate of VaughanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API