Legal Opinion

Edgar Luis M.R. v. Warden, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 27, 2026No. 1:26-cv-04296Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 EDGAR LUIS M.R.,1 11 No. 1:26-cv-04296-TLN-AC Petitioner, 12 A# 213-224-170 13 v. ORDER 14 WARDEN, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on pro se Petitioner Edgar Luis M.R.’s (“Petitioner”) 18 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“the Petition”) (ECF No. 1). Petitioner later filed a Motion 19 for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”).2 (ECF No. 16) Respondents filed an omnibus 20 response to the motion for TRO and habeas petition. (ECF No. 18.) For the reasons set forth 21 below, the Court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API