Legal Opinion
(PS) Martin v. Mez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 6, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00855Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN M MARTIN, No. 2:20-cv-855-JAM-JDP PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY RYAN MEZ, YOLO COUNTY 15 SHERIFF’S DEPUTY JEREMY HEMBREE, COUNTY OF YOLO, and 16 Does 1-5, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915.1
His 20 declaration makes the showing required by
28 U.S.C. §§1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. 21 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperisis granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 22 Determining that plaintiff…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.