Black v. Arizala
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1ConcurrenceArmstrong, P. J.
I agree with the majority’s decision to reverse the judgment dismissing the case and with its reasoning on the other issues. I disagree with its reasoning for reversing the dismissal and therefore write separately.
The majority makes a ruling of procedure and a ruling of substance in explaining its decision to reverse the dismissal; both are wrong. It first holds, procedurally, that the only way that defendants can obtain a pretrial decision on whether the forum selection clause applies to this case is by a motion for summary judgment. That holding ignores a statute that expressly permits the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Tracer Research Corp. v. National Environmental Services Company, Doing Business as Nesco Lab One Analytical, Inc. Eddy Paterson Albert McCutchanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Accelerated Christian Education, Inc. v. Oracle Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
- Reeves v. Chem Industrial CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.