Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Black v. Arizala

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 5, 2002No. 9611-09017, 9708-06851; A104791Published

1ConcurrenceArmstrong, P. J.

I agree with the majority’s decision to reverse the judgment dismissing the case and with its reasoning on the other issues. I disagree with its reasoning for reversing the dismissal and therefore write separately.

The majority makes a ruling of procedure and a ruling of substance in explaining its decision to reverse the dismissal; both are wrong. It first holds, procedurally, that the only way that defendants can obtain a pretrial decision on whether the forum selection clause applies to this case is by a motion for summary judgment. That holding ignores a statute that expressly permits the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tracer Research Corp. v. National Environmental Services Company, Doing Business as Nesco Lab One Analytical, Inc. Eddy Paterson Albert McCutchanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Accelerated Christian Education, Inc. v. Oracle Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  5. Reeves v. Chem Industrial CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API