Legal Opinion
Gerico Investment Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Public Service Television, Inc., Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 29, 1958No. 14179_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAHY, Circuit Judge.
The principal question pressed on this appeal 1 not foreclosed by our decision in a Gerico Investment Co. v. FCC, 99 U.S. App.D.C. 379, 240 F.2d 410, is whether the license of Gerico for television station WITY, on UHF Channel 17, Fort Lauder-dale, Florida, a community located twenty-five miles north of Miami, Florida, has been modified by the grant of a construction permit to intervenor Public Service Television, Inc., for the operation of a television station on VHF Channel 10, Miami. If so the Commission erred in failing to comply with section 316(a) of the Federal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Federal Communications Commission v. National Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Logansport Broadcasting Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- L. B. Wilson, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Coastal Bend Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Coastal Bend Television Company v. The United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, City of Nashville and the Nashville Chamber of Commerce, City of Tampa, Florida, and the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce, City of Kansas City, Missouri, City of St. Louis, Missouri, and the Chamber of Commerce of Metropolitan St. Louis, Trans World Airlines, Inc., Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors. American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, City of Tampa, Florida, and the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce, City of Kansas City, Missouri, City of St. Louis, Missouri, and the Chamber of Commerce of Metropolitan St. Louis, Trans World Airlines, Inc., Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, City of Tampa, Florida, and the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce, City of Kansas City, Missouri, City of St. Louis, Missouri, and the Chamber of Commerce of Metropolitan St. Louis, Trans World Airlines, Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors. National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, City of Tampa, Florida, and the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce, City of Kansas City, Missouri, City of St. Louis, Missouri, and the Chamber of Commerce of Metropolitan St. Louis, Trans World Airlines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Transcontinent Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Transcontinent Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Transcontinent Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Shasta Telecasting Corporation, Intervenor. Transcontinent Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Kern County Broadcasting Company and Shasta Telecasting Corporation, Intervenors. Transcontinent Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Kern County Broadcasting Company and Shasta Telecasting Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Friedman v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.