Fleck v. Collins
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 224, Oct. T., 1904, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Sept. T., 1898, No. 1488, M. L. D., on verdict for plaintiff in case of Henry H. Fleck and George O. J. Fleck, trading as Fleck Brothers, v. Dennis Collins et al. and George W. Kline, trading as Kline & Company. Scire facias sur municipal lien. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned among others was in refusing binding instructions for defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
The plaintiffs filed an apportioned mechanic’s lien against 132 buildings, of which forty-five fronted on the north side of Reinhard street, forty-four on the south side of said street, and forty-three on the north side of Upland street, all between Sixtieth and Sixty-first streets in the city of Philadelphia. The amount of the claim was $5,909.73, which was apportioned equally among the buildings. The lien averred that Upland and Reinhard streets were -not open or dedicated streets at the *445time the contractor, George "W". Kline, made his contract with the owners or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Commonwealth v. ShoemakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Dreifus v. Columbian Exposition Salvage Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Kirkham v. SharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
- Transue v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Milford Borough v. BurnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Easton v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Wynn AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. MyersCumberland County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.