Legal Opinion

International Light Metals v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 24, 1998No. 95-08-01037; Slip. Op. 98-122PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARMAN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56, contending the United States Customs Service (Customs) improperly denied its protests challenging Customs’ refusal to pay in full plaintiff’s claims for manufacturing substitution duty drawback. Plaintiff contends its manufacturing operations comply with the statutory and regulatory requirements necessary to receive manufacturing substitution duty drawback pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1313(b) (1988). Additionally, plaintiff asserts the partial denial of its drawback claims is contrary to Customs’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Light Metals, a Division of Martin Marietta Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. International Light Metals v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API