Legal Opinion
In Re Reinstatement of Ossanna
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 11, 1970No. 39008PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner was disbarred from practicing law in Minnesota on June 28, 1963, 1 and now seeks reinstatement. The only issue is whether he has proved by clear and satisfactory evidence that he is rehabilitated. 2 We hold that he has not. The petition is therefore denied.
The facts giving rise to the disbarment are set forth in Isaacs v. United States. 3 On November 15, 1960, petitioner was convicted in Federal court of six counts of mail fraud, two counts of wire fraud, three counts of fraudulent interstate shipment, and two counts of conspiracy. He was sentenced to serve two concurrent 4-year…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Application of Smith for Reinstatement as AttorneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- In Re Application of Strand for Reinstatement to Practice LawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- In Re Petition of ConstantineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- In re Discipline of OssannaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of Discipline of AgnewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Matter of Reinstatement of WegnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of KadrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Linda A. BROST, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 182692Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In Re Reinstatement of PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.