Legal Opinion

Farrand v. Farrand

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1947No. Civ. 15575PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From an interlocutory decree of divorce in favor of plaintiff predicated upon the ground of extreme cruelty, defendant appeals.

Plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce in which she alleged that since the marriage of the parties defendant had treated her in a cruel manner and had inflicted upon her grievous mental suffering and anguish. No specific acts of cruelty were alleged.

The only question necessary for us to determine is:

Was there suhstmtial evidence to support plaintiff’s allegation that defendant had treated her in a cruel manner and inflicted on her grevious mental suffering and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Truax v. TruaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Stanton v. StantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Bennett v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dowd v. DowdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Hayes v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Hellman v. HellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Riggs v. RiggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Karas v. KarasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API