Legal Opinion
Freedom to Travel Campaign v. Newcomb
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1996No. 95-15291PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge HALL; concurrence by Judge KOZINSKI.
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Freedom to Travel Campaign (“FTC”) and other appellants challenge the constitutionality of certain restrictions imposed on travel to Cuba by the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515 (1994). The district court denied FTC’s motion for a preliminary injunction and granted the Treasury Department’s motion for summary judgment upholding the regulations. The district court had jurisdiction to consider these claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Easyriders Freedom F.I.G.H.T. v. HanniganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Clancy v. Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Humanitarian Law Project v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Center for Biological Diversity v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Emergency Coalition to Defend Educational Travel v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.