Rushing v. State

In the motion for rehearing the appellant renews his complaints of the various matters discussed in the original opinion.

As reflected by the bill of exception, the action of the court with reference to the voir dire examination of the members of the jury panel was not an undue abridgement of the appellant's conceded right to acquire, by examination of the jurors, information upon which he might intelligently form a conclusion with reference to challenges. In the action of the court upon the subject nothing is perceived which is in conflict with the announcement of this court in the case of…