Legal Opinion

Rose v. US Nat. Bank of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1984No. 83-293PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cheuvront, D. J.

This replevin action was brought by the plaintiffs, George P. Rose, Jr., and George P. Rose, Sr., against the U.S. National Bank of Omaha, defendant. The plaintiff George P. Rose, Jr., prayed for possession of the object of the action, namely, a certain 1979 Ford Styleside pickup truck. The plaintiff George P. Rose, Sr., prayed that the court find that he had a “special interest” in the said vehicle and for damages resulting from the need to rent a replacement vehicle. Prior to trial, the pickup truck was returned to the plaintiffs and the case proceeded to trial on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of Valley v. MattsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Chappelear v. Grange & Farmers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Kirby v. BergfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Husebo v. Ambrosia, Ltd.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Idaho Forest Industries, Inc. v. Minden Exchange Bank & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greening v. School District of MillardNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McCoolidge v. OyvetskyNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Bank of Miami v. BANCO INDUS. Y GANADERODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. GREENING BY GREENING v. School Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Rose v. US Nat. Bank of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API