Baum, Bonita v. Mayo Clinic Ambulance

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN BONITA BAUM, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 20-cv-409-wmc MAYO CLINIC AMBULANCE, and GOLD CROSS AMBULANCE Defendants. On behalf of herself and other similarly-situated, putative plaintiffs, Bonita Baum claims that defendants Mayo Clinic Ambulance and Gold Cross Ambulance violated

Wis. Stat. §146.83, which prohibits health care providers from charging patients or patients’ representatives more than the statutory rate for copies of their medical records. Following discovery and motion practice, now before the court is…