Legal Opinion

Himelfarb v. Town of Brookline

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 26, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered on his complaint against the town in which he alleged that he suffered injuries when he fell on a negligently maintained sidewalk on Boylston Street, also known as Route 9. He claimed that his fall was caused by a defect in the sidewalk described as a “portion of the concrete sidewalk which is raised approximately IV2 inches above the abutting concrete slab, for a width of approximately two feet along the abutting section of the sidewalk.” The town asserted in its answer and motion for summary judgment that it had no duty to maintain the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stetson v. Board of Selectmen of CarlisleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Huff v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Sloper v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Hurlburt v. Town of Great BarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Rogers v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Farrell v. Boston Water & Sewer CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  2. Bonner v. Town of BellinghamMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996
  3. Bradstreet v. A.R. Belli, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1991
  4. Baird v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1990
  5. Bedard v. City of BostonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API