Jennings v. KAY JENNINGS FAMILY LTD.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY Senior Justice ELIZABETH B. LACY.
In this appeal we consider whether the trial court erred in dismissing Michael Jennings' derivative suit because Michael, a limited partner in the Kay Jennings Family Limited Partnership, did not "fairly and adequately represent the interests" of the limited partners and the partnership and therefore lacked standing to bring a derivative suit pursuant to Code § 50-73.62.
FACTS and PROCEEDINGS
Louis Allen Jennings operated a car dealership, Springfield Toyota, Inc. (the dealership), in Springfield, Virginia on land which he owned. In 1964, Louis…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. MelendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Davis v. Comed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- G. A. Enterprises, Inc. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Elgin v. Alfa Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hawthorne v. VanMarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- Hawkins v. FishbeckDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2017
- Cole v. Norfolk Southern RailwaySupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- CATTANO v. BraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Jill B. Landrum and David Landrum v. Livingston Holdings, LLC, B&S MS Holdings, LLC, Los Robles Investment Properties, LLC, Los Robles MS Investment Properties, LLC, Michael C. Bollenbacher, Robert Yamamoto, Taggart, Rimes & Graham, PLLC, Michael L. Sharpe, Marna Sharpe, Jamie Planck Martin, Jamie Planck Martin, LLC, Genysys MS Investment Properties, LLC, Providence Hill Farm, LLC, Providence Hill Farm Sporting Club, LLC, Chestnut Developers, LLC and Chestnut Hill, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.