Legal Opinion

Spatz v. Mile-Hi Realty

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1979No. 4910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Given a situation in which property is listed with a broker for sale by a written instrument which does not recite consideration from the broker to the owner, does the broker become entitled to a commission upon a sale by a competing broker when the evidence discloses no actual consideration furnished by the listing broker? We hold that the listing broker is entitled to no recovery under such circumstances, and we shall reverse the judgment of the trial court pursuant to which the listing broker recovered a commission.

Beginning in about April of 1975 Robert R. Spatz considered…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kruger v. SoreideNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stensgaard v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Braniff v. BaierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Bell v. DimmerlingOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Kolb v. J. E. Bennett Land Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson Excavating and Wrecking Company v. Certified Welding Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API