Legal Opinion

Roos v. Thigpen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1911PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fayette County; L. W. Moore, Judge. Action by Job Thigpen against Ed Roos. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

1 Writ of error denied by Supreme Court. This suit was brought by appellee, as plaintiff below, against appellant, as defendant, March 4, 1908, to enforce specific performance of the following contract, executed by them on the 10th of September, 1907, to wit:

"The State of Texas, County of Washington — This memorandum of an agreement this day made and entered into by and between Job Thigpen, of the county of Fayette and state of Texas, party of the first part, and Ed Roos of the county of Bexar, and state of Texas, party of the second part, witnesseth:
"(1) That first party, for and in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vought v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Cooper v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Greer v. International Stock YardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Hurt v. McReynoldsTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Hurt v. BlackburnTexas Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Giles v. Union Land Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Cline v. BootyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Shamrock Oil & Gas Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API