Legal Opinion
United States v. Hoerner
District Court, D. Montana
Decided December 20, 1957No. Civ. No. 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
In this action the Government is condemning certain lands in Flathead County, Montana. The issue of just compensation was referred to three commissioners, and their report was filed August 23, 1957. Defendants have filed a motion to *565set aside and void the hearing before the commissioners, and their report, on the ground that “personal service of notice was not made on all persons having or claiming to have an interest in the property * * * as is required by Rule 71A of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
The defendants Jack E. Hoerner and Olga B. Hoerner, his wife,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gravelin v. PorierMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Lamont v. VingerMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Haggerty v. Sherburne Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
- Grable v. KillitsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Concrete Steel Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olympic Insurance Company v. H. D. Harrison, Incorporated D/B/A Harrison Insurance Service, Hugh D. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Russell McPhail v. The L. S. Starrett CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958