Legal Opinion

Bonus Charge on Street Railway Companies

Pennsylvania Department of Justice

Decided December 29, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

Reno, Attorney General,

You inquire whether street railway companies which were in*76corporated under the Act of May 14, 1889, P. L. 211, while the Bonus Act of May 1, 1868, P. L. 108, was in effect, were required to pay bonus by that act.

You state that the filing in your department of an agreement of consolidation and merger between the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company, the present operating corporation, and its 64 underliers, has revealed that 19 of the underliers were incorporated as above stated and paid no bonus to the Commonwealth.

The Act of 1868, supra, with which we are concerned here,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Garr v. FulsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Borough of Millvale v. Evergreen Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Commonwealth v. MannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Gyger v. Phila. etc. Ry. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API