Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Kern

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1926No. 19834PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The deed of George Kern to his son, William H. Kern, contained a recital that the grant was made “for the consideration of nine thousand dollars ($9,000.00), received to my full satisfaction of William H. Kern, the grantee,” etc.

The son having died intestate and without issue, his widow brought this suit claiming title in fee as the relict of the intestate by virtue of Section 8574, General Code. If the property came to her husband by deed of purchase, Lottie Kern’s title in fee must be sustained; if it came by deed of gift, she has merely a life estate, under the provisions of Section 8573,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thiessen v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Miller v. StokelyOhio Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of Niemi v. Niemi, 2008-T-0082 (5-1-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. First National Bank of Middletown v. GregoryOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. National Bank v. AllenAllen County Probate Court · 1952
  4. Naus v. VorndranOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Muckerheide v. ZinkHamilton County Probate Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API