Legal Opinion

United States v. Rajaratnam

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 11, 2011No. 09 Cr. 1184(RJH)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge:

On May 11, 2011, a jury found defendant Rajaratnam guilty of five counts of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and nine counts of securities fraud. Before the Court is Rajaratnam’s renewed motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29 for a judgment of acquittal on all counts. For the following reasons, the motion is denied in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

On January 20, 2011, a grand jury returned a second superseding indictment charging Rajaratnam with five counts of conspiring to trade on the basis of inside information…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Newman and ChiassonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. In re Aéropostale, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. United States v. WhitmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. United States v. WhitmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. United States v. SteinbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API