Legal Opinion

New Idea Spreader Co. v. Satterfield

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1928No. 4732PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, C. J.

This action was brought against respondents, as guarantors, to recover a balance due on an account with the Intermountain Farmers’ Equity, of which respondents were directors. The contract of guaranty, procured from respondents by the Intermountain Farmers’ Equity at appellant’s request, provides that the undersigned “ .... guarantee and hold myself personally responsible for the payment .... of all ... . goods, wares and merchandise so sold and delivered, whether evidenced by open account or note.....” At the close of appellant’s evidence, the trial court sustained respondent’s motion for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. McGowan v. Wells' TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Midland National Bank v. Security Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Crittenden v. FiskeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Idaho v. ColleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Shaw Supply Co., Inc. v. MorganIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Chevron Chemical Co. v. MechamDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
  5. Kresge Department Stores, Inc. v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API