Legal Opinion

Plaza National Bank v. Monfrey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1986No. 04-84-00167-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before CADENA, C.J., and CANTU and TIJERINA, JJ. CADENA, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, Plaza National Bank, appeals from a judgment, based on jury findings, that it take nothing in its suit to recover on four promissory notes, each of which was signed by one of the four defendants, Frank Monfrey, Anthony Monfrey, Henry M. Hunter, Jr., and Terry Downs. Defendants admitted execution of the notes and nonpayment, basing their defenses solely on the ground that the notes were unenforceable because each note represented a loan made by Plaza National Bank for the purpose of “aiding or defeating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James Stewart & Co. v. LawTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Mayfield v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. International Aircraft Sales, Inc. v. BetancourtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Hogue v. National Bank of Commerce of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Park v. CoulsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crowder v. Benchmark Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  2. Georgeine Mike Korompay v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2005-NC3 Asset Backed Pass Through Certificates, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API