Joe Tyson Mathes v. R.L. Hornbarger
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
In Winslow v. Walters, 815 F.2d 1114 (7th Cir.1987), we held that while federal courts are precluded by 38 U.S.C. § 211(a) from altering Veterans Administration (VA) determinations regarding an award of benefits, federal courts are not divested of jurisdiction over suits challenging the constitutionality of the VA’s procedures under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. In the instant appeal, the district court, without the benefit of our decision in Winslow, concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appellant’s procedural challenge to the VA’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stephen Marozsan v. The United States of America and the Veterans' Administration, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Marozsan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
- Hoerner v. United States Veterans AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Stephen Marozsan v. The United States of America and the Veterans' Administration, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Stephen Marozsan v. The United States of America and the Veterans' Administration, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.