Legal Opinion
Stephen Marozsan v. The United States of America and the Veterans' Administration, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 25, 1988No. 86-1954PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge,
with whom BAUER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS, HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., CUDAHY, POSNER, and KANNE, Circuit Judges, join.
Stephen Marozsan filed a complaint in the district court alleging in part that the Veterans’ Administration violated his constitutional right to due process of law. The district court ruled that 38 U.S.C. § 211(a) “bars a court from hearing and reviewing an action challenging a decision of the V.A., even when a plaintiff alleges that the decision violates his constitutional rights.” Marozsan v. United States, 635 F.Supp. 578, 580 (N.D.Ill.1986). Because…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Gary Laguerre v. Janet Reno, Jose, Martin Avelar-Cruz v. Janet RenoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Manuel Parra v. Brian Perryman, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Yang v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Gregory R. Czerkies v. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration and Office of Workers Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Shamsher Singh v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States, and Brian R. Perryman, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.