Legal Opinion
United States v. Furman Lattimore, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 25, 1996No. 94-5915PublishedCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINS wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judges RUSSELL, WIDENER, NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS joined. Judge HALL wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Judges MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ joined.
OPINION
WILKINS, Circuit Judge:
Furman Lattimore, Jr. appeals a decision of the district court denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during a consent search of his automobile. Because we cannot conclude that the district court clearly erred in finding that Lattimore’s consent to search was freely and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- United States v. Otis Lee Weaver, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Mark L. SimonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Stephen DigiovanniCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- United States v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.