Legal Opinion
Tedesco v. United States Postal Service
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 17, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-1078PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHILL, District Judge.
This case turns on a construction of certain provisions of the Postal Reorganization Act, 39 U.S.C. §§ 101-5605 (1976), (hereinafter the “Postal Reorganization Act”). The plaintiffs are individual residents of Cranberry Township, Butler County, Pennsylvania, who have been trying to convince the Postal Service to establish a post office in their township for more than two years. Having failed to persuade the Postal Service, the plaintiffs commenced this suit, alleging that the Postal Service has violated its duty to provide “prompt, reliable and efficient”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Peoples Gas, Light And Coke Company v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lance Lemay, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and on Behalf of the General Public v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Stephen B. Licata v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Continental Cablevision of St. Paul, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Shelby Resources, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Morris v. RunyonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.