Rose v. Sheedy
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action to recover damages in the sum of $10,000 for an alleged assault. A trial resulted in a verdict for appellant, defendant below. The trial court granted plaintiff a new trial and defendant appealed.
[1] The sole question on this appeal is whether the trial court was justified in sustaining plaintiff's motion for a new trial on the ground that the court refused to permit plaintiff's counsel to question the jurors on voir dire examination as to their religious affiliations. It is stipulated that only that part of the proceedings had at the trial pertaining to the interrogation of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Connors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- State v. KokoszkaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- The People v. HinshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. BettsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Edwards v. Business Men's Assurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Cordero v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Strahl v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.