Legal Opinion · Dissent

Franek v. Butler County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1934No. 28917Published

1DissentPaine, J.

I respectfully dissent from the main opinion in this case, which holds that counties under township organization are not liable for damages for injuries growing out of defects in a road or bridge unless the particular road has been designated as a county road, or unless the bridge passes over a stream.

The effect of this holding is to entirely relieve a county from liability; no matter how grossly negligent its officers or employees may have been, I presume it is held to be an illustration of damnum absque injuria.

However, the first fundamental legal principle set out in Broom’s Legal Maxims,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Madden v. Lancaster CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Swaney v. County of GageNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Frickel v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Loso v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. King v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API