National Air Traffic Controllers Ass'n v. Burnley
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VUKASIN, District Judge.
In this action the plaintiff union and three of its members challenge a program for urinalysis drug testing of air traffic controllers where there is reason to believe that the employee contributed to the cause of an accident or incident.1 The matter came before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of venue and on cross-motions for summary judgment on the merits. For the reasons stated in the Court’s oral ruling following argument on the motions and more fully stated below, the Government’s motion to dismiss and the plaintiffs’ motion for summary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lahey v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- AJ Taft Coal Co., Inc. v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2003
- Finley v. National Endowment for the ArtsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1992
- Sidney Coal Co., Inc. v. MassanariDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2002
- Gerald B. Watson, Jr. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- NAT. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS v. BurnleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988