Legal Opinion

Flowers v. Zeilinger

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 11, 1938No. 14,264PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burke

These parties are hereinafter referred to as Flowers and the conservator respectively.

In the county court Flowers moved to discharge the conservator. The motion was denied. Flowers appealed to the district court. The conservator moved to dismiss because the order appealed from was not final. The district court so held and' entered judgment accordingly. To review that judgment this writ is prosecuted. There are three assignments, but all are included in the first, which reads: “In finding and holding that an order denying* a petition for the removal of a conservator of the estate of an insane…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cole v. KyleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Handley v. HilliardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  3. Woodrow W. Bussey v. Plumbers Local No. 3, Etc., Et Al.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  4. O'Neill v. IrwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  5. O'Neill v. IrwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API