Legal Opinion

Peters v. Peters

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 21, 1927No. 11,711PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

On appeal hy them from the county to the district court of El .Paso county, Harold C. and John H. Peters and Erma E. Polster, their sister, had a decree that they were the sole heirs of Albert H. Peters, deceased, whose widow, Stella F. Peters, plaintiff in error, claimed to be. She brings the case here for review.

The plaintiff in error claims that the appeal bonds, one by Harold and John and one by Erma, on appeal to the district court, were insufficient, (1) Because executed by an attorney in fact, without the power of attorney being shown, and (2) because not in proper form as required by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Dusing v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Githens v. GithensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Rockwell v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  5. Lipe v. FoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Salida School District R-32-J v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Stillings v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  3. Estate of Burford v. BurfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Matter of Estate of DodgeColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Boxwell v. Greeley Union National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API