Pope v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
William Pope was convicted of assault in the first degree and was sentenced to life imprisonment as a habitual felony offender. He raises three issues on this appeal from that conviction.
I
The appellant alleges that he was denied due process due to the admission into evidence of: a) a highly incriminating statement and b) photographs of the victim's wounds. The appellant admits that these alleged "defects . . . by themselves, may not constitute reversible error."
The appellant's statement was voluntary and was properly admitted into evidence despite the fact that the statement contained the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Elmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Sexton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Wray v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Capps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte State, 1100640 (Ala. 6-30-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.