Legal Opinion

Pope v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 23, 1991No. CR 90-703PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William Pope was convicted of assault in the first degree and was sentenced to life imprisonment as a habitual felony offender. He raises three issues on this appeal from that conviction.

I

The appellant alleges that he was denied due process due to the admission into evidence of: a) a highly incriminating statement and b) photographs of the victim's wounds. The appellant admits that these alleged "defects . . . by themselves, may not constitute reversible error."

The appellant's statement was voluntary and was properly admitted into evidence despite the fact that the statement contained the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Elmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Sexton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Wray v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. Capps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Ex Parte State, 1100640 (Ala. 6-30-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API