Legal Opinion

PENUMELLA v. PHAM

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01197Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SRINIVAS PENUMELLA Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-1197 THOMAS TAM TUONG PHAM Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rufe, J. December 28, 2023 Plaintiff Srinivas Penumella filed suit against Defendant Thomas Tam Tuong Pham for breach of contract. Pham failed to respond to the Complaint or otherwise appear. The Clerk having entered default, Penumella seeks a default judgment against Pham in the amount of the principal due under the parties’ agreement along with attorneys’ fees and post-judgment interest. For the reasons set…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Eric Robinson v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Mike FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API