Legal Opinion

Spokane Terminal Co. v. Stanford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1906No. 6265PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered July 6, 1906, after a trial on the merits, adjudging title, as between contesting defendants, to lands appropriated in condemnation proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

This action was instituted by a petition filed by the Spokane Terminal Company for the condemnation of lots 30 and 31, in Second Addition to Third Addition to Rail*46road Addition to Spokane Falls. In the petition it was alleged that the defendants L. P. Stanford and wife were the owners of the lots, and that the defendant the Washington Safe Deposit & Trust Company claimed some hen thereon or interest therein. The Washington Safe Deposit & Trust Company appeared and filed an answer, denying the ownership of the lots by the Stanfords, alleging title in itself; and that the Stanfords occupied the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Turpin v. LemonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. State ex rel. Steel v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. Mills v. County of ThurstonWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Sutton v. StoneNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  5. City of Forth Yakima v. ScudderWashington Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lara v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Lindsay Irrigation District v. Clallam CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Stockand v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State ex rel. Heath v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API