Legal Opinion

Kahananui v. Maunakea

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Circuit Judge, Eirst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, C.J.

At the hearing of the administrator’s petition for a decree of final distribution the plaintiffs, being a grandnephew and two grandnieces of the intestate, claimed to be entitled to share equally with the children of the decedent’s niece who survived her and had since deceased and assign error in the decree excluding them from taking. The decedent left a husband, whose share of one-half of the estate is not disputed, the question being whether the words in the statute (Sec. 2509 E. L.), “The children of any brother or sister by right of representation,”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walton v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  2. Prowitt v. . RodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Bowker v. BowkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Beebe v. . EstabrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Eshleman's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Trust Estate Created Under Deed of Trust by LopezHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hawaiian Trust Co. v. GalbraithHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  3. In re the Estate of HartwellHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  4. In Re the Trust Estate Created Under Deed of Trust by LopezHawaii Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API